8 Comments

1. When I say that Doug Wilson is grotesquely, immensely, morbidly fat, this is not because he differs with me. It is because he is grotesquely, immensely, morbidly fat. If I say Doug Wilson is a large, blimp-like pig, it is not because he disagrees with me about something. Other factors are in play, one of them being that he is a large, blimp-like pig.

   …Boy, this is fun. Let’s do more of this.

   1. It is easily, visually verifiable that “Pastor” Wilson is a heart attack waiting to happen. The proof is in the pudding, of which, it appears, he consumes by the gallon. However, the subjective determination of who is a “harridan” or a “biddie” is merely the mean spirited opinion of a very peculiar man who is a heart attack waiting to happen.

2. “She’s a biddie because I say she’s a biddie.”

   I’m not sure what’s funnier: Doug’s insistence on using 60s vernacular or Doug’s circular reasoning.

3. I read the whole post and it struck me that he insisted we ignore his thoughts in Slavery as it was and pay attention to Black and Tan because he wrote that book after people got upset about his views on slavery.
   Also that he claims he respects women and titles the post to insult women.
   If he were not so serious, he could have a very lucrative career as an SNL writer.

4. Advertisement for Ladies Seminar with the Femina Gals. Title: “Dangerous Women.” I wonder if they’ll take their cue from Doug and talk about biddies, crones, harridans, harpies, & termagants. Or maybe they’ll have PowerPoint slides on boobs.

   http://www.feminagirls.com/2016/03/12/coming-soon/

5. “A gracious Christian woman could try to speak on a modern American campus in order to advance her thesis that women ought to spend more time at home baking biscuits from scratch, the kind you eat with honey/butter, and she would have protesters show up covered in fake blood, eager to shout her down. That’s the kind of thing they do, serene in the manifestation of their own righteousness. A woman making biscuits for her sweet baby is rape culture.”

   — Doug Wilson
   https://dougwils.com/s7-engaging-the-culture/trump-change.html

   Does this make any sense to anyone at all? Talk about jumping the shark. What the hell is Doug even talking about here?

   1. @Dash — you missed the defining sentence:

      “Claiming the right to shut down any form of hate speech, all they then have to do is maintain that any opinion differing from theirs must be hate speech.”

      His larger point is correct. The left outlaws dissent under the guise of “hate speech.” The point he ignores is how he outlaws dissent under the guise “loyalty.” The left requires conformity. Wilson requires conformity grounded in loyalty.

6. Could anyone show me an example of Doug calling a woman a derogatory name *without* it being motivated by her disagreeing with him in some way? What would the point of putting her down be if he wasn’t taking issue with something? As in Doug saying (sincerely, not sarcastically): “I really like and respect you, x. We seem to agree on everything. You are my favorite biddie (or harridan or day old donut…) ever.” I’m pretty sure such an example (if found) would be an exception to the rule.

Comments are closed.