“Reject every form of fraud and ungodly deceit.”

Reject every form of fraud and ungodly deceit.
Douglas Wilson

6 Comments

    1. @Rachel: According to Doug Wilson, the answer is yes. He distinguishes between ungodly and godly deceit in the same way he distinguishes between violent and non-violent rape.

      Stealing a letterhead from the University of Idaho and using it to perpetrate a fraud against the entire Palouse is “godly deceit,” whereas fisting a 14-year-old girl doesn’t even rise to the level of rape, let alone “non-violent rape.” In fact, he calls it “secret courtship.”

      Hope that answers your question.

    2. I figured there was hairsplitting going on. It was mainly a rhetoric question recognizing that he was probably making a distinction.

    3. Not familiar with the theft of university letterhead incident; would you clarify?

      I’m only one person and there is so much Wilsonian malfeasance, bad acts, skulduggery, prevarication and general buffoonery that it’s hard to keep track of everything.

  1. Sorry, I knew it was rhetorical. I’m writing a post where he uses the word “violent rape,” which is a point that’s been discussed here, and I ran with it.

Comments are closed.