My point is that jiggling your boobs for a YouTube clip is a response to an ignorant Muslim that works equally well as a response to the apostle Peter, which is to say, not at all.
Douglas Wilson
4 Comments
Comments are closed.
The Truth About Moscow
Um..what?
This is bit more from Wilson’s hate-filled diatribe:
“On Monday, many thousands of them (my note: women in t-shirts) did so, in what passes for political discourse these days. It would be fair to say that there were many incidents of déclassé décolletage — unattractive feminist scientists flaunting what they thought was sexuality, attractive bimbo queens taking the opportunity, natch, aging beauties reliving the glory days, and all of them over the top, so to speak.”
The messages he repeatedly sends drip with contempt for women, simply because they are women. Their sexuality is negated because he deems them unattractive! Wearing comfortable clothing is “flaunting” their sexuality, but there’s more! He describes women made in the image of his creator as “bimbo queens” because they convey comfort with their god-given sexuality and “aging beauties” because, in his judgment, their motive is to seduce men just as (he supposes) they did in their youth.
Wilson is the worst of judges, repeatedly deciphering motives then bludgeoning his victims (usually women) with the harshest of judgments.
This man needs serious psychotherapy, and I don’t mean nouthetic, to work out his juvenile mommy/breast fetish. That he can simultaneously spew this crap and also a winsome plea for the gospel at Piper’s site is either hypocritical, sociopathic, or both.
And I used to wonder why I had contempt for other women (I don’t feel that way anymore, for the record). . . . Heh. Thanks, Doug.
Comments like the ones made by Mr. Wilson regarding women ought to be a red flag for Christians seeking truth; godly men should be protecting their wives and children from his ungodly influence.