“Smash the Complementarity”

So feminism — smash the patriarchy feminism — wants us to be ruled by harridans, termagants, harpies and crones. That sets the tone, and the pestering is then made complete by small-breasted biddies who want to make sure nobody is using too much hot water in the shower, and that we are all getting plenty of fiber. And if anyone reads these words and believes that I am attacking all women by them, that would provide great example of why we should not entrust our cultural future to people who can’t read.
Douglas Wilson

9 Comments

  3. The parts of the original comment thread discussing the pros and cons of DW’s use of “small-breasted biddies” gives a good picture of the kind of people who follow him.

  5. Doug Wilson is so cavalierly impure…so sure that no one will call him on it. So sure that he can get away with it, because after all, he always has. No one that sits under his teaching has any real commitment to Biblical holiness, or they wouldn’t stand for it.

  6. Rule by “harridans, termagants, harpies and crones”? Not true, (smashing one-sided male rule does not mean setting up one-sided female rule, much less necessarily by evil females) but considering banana republics and male presidents-for-life, church-leading men who hide sexual abusers from prosecution, rich male business leaders who influence politicians to go to war – as they can get rich from it, I don’t think rule by women could make the world much worse.

    Consider: The world’s worst female dictator was perhaps Bloody Mary, who had 283 Protestants executed. The worst male dictator, Mao Zedong, is about 200 000 times worse.

  7. I don’t think the original comments exist anymore. You’d think that some of his followers would get tired of his harping on sex. It would be interesting to do a study on how many times DW has blogged about sex.

    1. They are preserved on the web.archive.org link. If you click on “Douglas Wilson” in the quote post and scroll down, they’re there.

Comments are closed.